1 May 2002
- United Nations
- Economic and Social Council
- Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
- First Session, 13-24
May 2002, New York
- Item 6 of the
provisional agenda
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND HEALTH
A Briefing Paper For The
Permanent Forum On Indigenous Issues
Prepared by the
Committee on Indigenous Health[1]
1. The Committee
on Indigenous Health has prepared this briefing paper for the United
Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, on the occasion of its
inaugural session from 13-24 May 2002 at the Headquarters of the United
Nations Organisation (UNO) in New York City, USA. The intent of this paper
is to inform the members of the Permanent Forum of the current situation,
review progress, recommendation and provide an entry point for this august
body into the health and survival issues of indigenous peoples and nations
from their own perspective and experiences. It is a voice of the
indigenous peoples and nations. The paper is not an exhaustive or
comprehensive treatment of the health issues among the indigenous peoples
and nations of the world nor is it to be viewed as a definitive submission
by the Committee on Indigenous Health to the members of the Permanent
Forum.
1. The Committee wishes to take this
opportunity to express its satisfaction at the establishment of the
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues within the International Decade on
the World’s Indigenous People; and believes that, with its establishment,
the on-going process within the United Nations to address indigenous
peoples’ issues concerning their human rights will be further
strengthened.
1. The Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues is mandated by ECOSOC (resolution 2000/22) to
discuss indigenous issues within the mandate of the Council relating to
economic and social development, culture, the environment, education,
health and human rights. The mandate specifically empowers the Permanent
Forum to provide expert advice and recommendations on indigenous issues to
the Council as well as to programmes, funds and agencies of the United
Nations, through the Council.
1. It is
recognised that health, as perceived by indigenous peoples and nations, is
a very broad and holistic concept that is not confined to the narrower
conventional health concept or definition. Within the ambit of Permanent
Forum’s wide mandate, this paper hopes to review the current status and
contribute to the discussions on the health of indigenous peoples so that
it may be of assistance to the members of the Permanent Forum’s
discussions, expert advice and recommendations in this area.
1. The Committee
has worked closely with the Working Group on Indigenous populations since
1997 and continues to do so. In this regard, the Committee on Indigenous
Health wishes to reiterate its steadfast commitment and full support to
the endeavours of the Permanent Forum in fulfilling its important mandate.
1. We recognise,
however, that some progress has been achieved in the standard-setting
activities within the United Nations and some regional inter-governmental
organizations. The work of the Sub-Commission’s Working Group on
Indigenous Populations since 1982 has been an inspiring rallying point for
indigenous peoples and nations as well as many international organisations
and specialized agencies and bodies of the United Nations. The
International Labour Office (ILO) had paved the way in its progressive
revision of Convention 107.
1. Among the
areas in which increasing progress on the rights of indigenous peoples and
nations in international and regional agendas have been made, mention may
be made of inter alia the UN Declaration on the Rights of the Indigenous
Peoples, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the work of its
monitoring body – the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the Convention
on Biological Diversity, OAS Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples, the Berlin Agenda (5 November 1999), UN Framework on the
Convention on Climate Change, the Convention to Combat Desertification and
UN Development Programme’s draft policy.
1. However, there
are other areas of work among international organisations where indigenous
peoples and nations, from all regions, have expressed deep concern. These
include the World Bank’s present conversion process of OD 4.20 and
revision of the draft Operational Policy/Bank Procedures 4.10 and
Indigenous Peoples policy of the Asian Development Bank. Special mention
must be made on the current work being undertaken by the World
Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) and the Intergovernmental
Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional
Knowledge and Folklore. The issues being dealt with are of special
significance to the health of Indigenous Peoples and Nations, and the COIH
looks forward to the outcomes of the Committee.
1. Important
thematic world conferences during the last century have also focused on
the particular problematic of the indigenous peoples, calling on the
international community to take urgent and appropriate action. Mention may
be made inter alia of the Rio Declaration (1992; principle 22; agenda 21:
26.1), Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action of the World Conference
on Human Rights (June 1993, Para 20 section I), the International
Conference on Population and Development (Cairo 1994; Para 6.25 and 6.27);
the Beijing Platform for Action of the Fourth World Conference on Women
(1995, Para 116, 230, 233 and 242), and the Copenhagen Declaration on
Social Development of the World Summit for Social Development (Copenhagen
1996, principle and goal 26m; commitment 6g, access to health care; 4f,
support indigenous peoples’ aspirations for social justice and to provide
an environment that facilitates indigenous peoples’ participation in
socio-economic and political life of their country). Much more need to be
done on the ground to make effective and lasting changes to the situation
of indigenous peoples and nations, however.
1. Recently, at
the World Conference on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and
Related Intolerance (Durban, 2001), the adopted Declaration and Programme
of Action have definitively expressed the world’s deep concern for the
situation of indigenous peoples. These concerns that include the crucial
issues of discrimination, self-determination and exclusion of indigenous
peoples have very deep and ramifying implications for indigenous peoples’
survival and health.
1. In July 2001,
during the session of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations, the
Committee on Indigenous Health established formal contact with the newly
established Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and
fundamental freedoms of Indigenous People, Mr. Rodolfo Stavenhagen. In his
first report to the Commission on Human Rights the Special Rapporteur has
referred to the progress made in the area of health through a developing
partnership between the World Health Organisation and indigenous peoples
(E/CN.4/2002/97 dated 4 February 2002; Para 24). He has outlined the
future activities of the Special Rapporteur, which includes particular
areas of great significance to the health situation of indigenous peoples
(Para 113 [a] to [g]).
1. The Special
Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate
standard of living, Mr. Miloon Kothari, stated in his first report to the
Commission on Human Rights, in (E/CN.4/2001/51) that it was necessary to
broaden the interpretation of the right to adequate housing since
international legal standards already existed to address these, from a
human rights based approach. Of particular interest the Special
Rapporteur included within the framework of his mandate and related to
health and well being is that of access to potable water. In the
meanwhile several Indigenous NGO's reminded the Special Rapporteur, and
others, that they have an obligation to include indigenous peoples in
their reports according to CHR resolution 1993/30 which call on them "to
pay special attention, within the framework of their mandates, to the
situation of Indigenous Peoples."
The Committee on Indigenous Health
1. The Committee
on Indigenous Health (COIH) an indigenous peoples’ representative
independent focal point was established by the Indigenous Peoples’ Caucus
prior to the 15th session Working Group on Indigenous Populations in 1997
to:
a. ensure
indigenous representation and participation in development and planning
related to health issues, policy and initiatives.
b. assess the
globalisation impact on indigenous health by environment degradation,
rights violation and forced relocation.
c. provide a
consistent interface with international and intergovernmental agencies and
to ensure the dissemination of information to the widest possible extend
among indigenous peoples, national government and other stakeholders.
1. A Forum on Indigenous Peoples and
Health, in conjunction with the WGIP sessions, has been held annually at
the Palais des Nations, Geneva by the COIH and WHO since 1998.
1. During the “International
Consultation on the Health of Indigenous Peoples”, (Geneva, 21-22 November
1999) jointly organised by COIH And WHO, COIH organised a Indigenous
Peoples’ Health Caucus and drafted, after extended discussions, “The
Geneva Declaration on the Health and Survival of Indigenous Peoples” (see
Annex 1). This Declaration was adopted during the International
Consultation. The International Consultation was organised to progress a
global plan of action for addressing and promoting the health of
indigenous peoples. A framework for Indigenous Peoples’ Health Policy was
also adopted at the Consultation. The framework identified three
pre-requisites to address the health of the indigenous peoples; “respect
for fundamental human rights; recognition of indigenous peoples; and
political will of the states” and the approach to their development is
characterized by three inter-related themes of; “interconnectedness,
self-determination and Equity”. Each approach has three principles,
“interconnectedness is associated with cultural responsiveness,
intersectoralism, and vertical integration; self-determination is
associated with control, capacity-building and intellectual property and
Equity is associated with quality information, accountability and
resourcing”.
1. The Consultation made a number of
recommendations to WHO’s regional offices, State governments and the
office of the Director-General. A summary of the recommendations is
annexed for the information of the members of the Permanent Forum on
Indigenous Issues. (See Annex 2)
1. At a short glance, it should be
noted that throughout the 20th century and continuing into the 21st
century Indigenous Peoples and Nations and their rights to survival and
well being faced and continue to face serious threat, with most of the
governments of the world refusing to recognize, respect, protect and
promote the fundamental human rights to health, to cultural knowledge,
practices and identity, to land, to self-determination and to life of the
indigenous peoples.
Enduring concerns for indigenous peoples’
survival and health
1. It is not
within the scope of this briefing paper to elaborate or discuss at length
the extremely wide scope of the health issues concerning indigenous
peoples. However, considering the grave situation of many indigenous
peoples and given the fact the “health gap” between indigenous peoples and
other population groups living within countries continues to widen
rapidly, the members of the Permanent Forum are requested to facilitate a
special briefing session on the health of the indigenous peoples during
the inaugural session. COIH is committed to cooperate with and support the
Permanent Forum conduct such briefings on a regular basis.
1. The right to
health is universally recognized, indivisibly linked to the right to life.
It is recognized in article 25 of the Universal Declaration on Human
Rights; articles 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights; articles 25 of the ILO Convention no.169 and articles 8
of the Declaration on the Right to Development. Indigenous peoples
perceptions and experience of health is much wider than those of other
groups of the population, in a sense that indigenous peoples approach
health in holistic terms, which incorporates physical, cultural,
emotional, mental and spiritual balance.
1. The
development of indigenous peoples health is inextricably linked to their
wider social, cultural, economic and political development. The ways in
which indigenous peoples measure the health and vitality of their
community is also different from the conventional concept of health. The
degree of self-government, the ability to participate in cultural
practices and expressions, extent of access to traditional lands, or the
numbers of speakers of their language may be considered indicators of
equal importance as access to health services or the incidence rates of
diabetes, tuberculosis, or malaria, of the health of the indigenous
peoples.
1. As we have
reached the last quarter of the International Decade of the World’s
Indigenous Peoples, it is a matter of grave concern that no concrete
policy on the health of the indigenous peoples is in sight. The continued
absence of such a policy or strategy has meant that systematic and
organized work even on the preliminary and urgent task of accurately
identifying and documenting health disparities between indigenous peoples
and other populations is not taking place at the pace expected. Our
attention is also drawn at the pace of progress of the specific
intergovernmental and other specialized agencies dealing with
health-related issues in establishing a comprehensive programme of action.
Coordinated efforts must be made at both policy and activity levels. These
efforts must be appropriate, integrated and sustainable.
1. There is the primary concern of
indigenous peoples for their survival as a group, the daily threat of
ethnic violence, repression and the lack of essential health and welfare
services. Armed and civil conflicts and development interventions that
cause the displacement of indigenous communities and disturb the social
lives aggravate the health problems. There is continuing discrimination of
indigenous peoples in national health policies and access to health care.
The links between the loss of land, of tradition economic structures,
environment degradation and poor health conditions cannot be refuted.
Diseases resulted from the loss of cultural identity due to colonization,
marginalization, militarization, industrialization, globalization and
discrimination are well recognised.
1. As the major determinants lie
outside the direct influence of the conventional health sector, there is
an urgent need to directly involve the social, economic, cultural and
political sectors including the private sector, whose activities have
great impact of the health and survival of indigenous peoples, and evolve
new ways of working together and establishing an effective partnership to
address the health situation of indigenous peoples. The full participation
of indigenous peoples is essential to ensure an integrated and appropriate
approach, which is vital to the success of any policy, strategy or
programme.
The World Health Organisation
1. The World
Health Assembly, which governs the World Health Organisation responded
very positively to the global objectives of the International Decade on
the World’s Indigenous Peoples. Its annual resolutions since 1994 (WHA
47.27, 48.24, 49.26, 50.31, 51.24, 53.10 and 54.16) affirm its continuing
commitment. Last year, the fifty-fourth World Health Assembly, made its
seventh annual resolution urging its member States and requesting its
regional bodies and the Director-General of WHO on a number of appropriate
actions to address the deplorable health situation of indigenous peoples.
1. One of the
major achievements in the area of international health is the Initiative
on the Health of the Indigenous People of the Americas undertaken by the
Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO). However, this initiative is
limited to two regions of the Western Hemisphere and the initiative by
PAHO has not been implemented in other regions of the world.
1. The progress
made by WHO, a technical inter-governmental advisory body, has been
important though it has been also characterised by caution, hurdles of
institutional arrangements and fixing of responsibilities. While WHO's
contribution to the Decadal efforts, and particularly in the Region of the
Americas, is commendable, one crucial element needs to be kept in the fore
as further steps are contemplated and anticipated - establishment of
partnership mechanisms with consistent and close consultation with
indigenous peoples' representative organisations. It is encouraging that
the WHO Secretariat, in its last report (WHA 54/33), acknowledges the
advisory mandate of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues to the bodies
of the UN system.
1. One,
constantly cited, constraint to WHO in fulfilling its Decadal commitment
is the issue of information. There is very little data, acceptable to WHO
and its established partners, on the situation of the health of indigenous
peoples from the different regions of the world. The evidence to form the
basis of any technical initiative seems to be still ephemeral and beyond
the reach of WHO.
1. Many
governments in whose territorial limits indigenous peoples exist have not
compiled disaggregated information on their socio-economic or cultural
situation. This has been regularly mentioned in WHO’s annual reports with
regard to the Decade, and reflects the deeply seated resistance to the
recognition of our very existence – a prerequisite to the recognition of
our rights. While these lacunae are universally acknowledged, lack of
political will has inhibited the adoption of any effective measures to
address these.
1. In this
regard, the respected members of the Permanent Forum are invited to give
their attention to one of the key recommendations of the Consultation to
establish an Indigenous Peoples’ Health Advisory Group as a matter of
priority. At the invitation of WHO, in 2000, the co-Chairperson of COIH,
Dr. D. Roy Laifungbam, drafted a Terms of Reference for this proposed
IPHAG (see Annex 3). Significantly, resolution WHA54.16 of 2001 also
acknowledged the recommendations of the "International Consultation on the
Health of Indigenous Peoples" (COIH/WHO, Geneva, November 1999), as a
point of departure, where appropriate, for the development of regional
plans of action. Unfortunately, very little progress has been made in WHO
to implement the important recommendations of the International
Consultation on the Health of Indigenous Peoples.
1. It has been
repeatedly demonstrated that a close and meaningful partnership with
indigenous peoples in addressing national development policies and their
implementation is not just desirable but can usher in positive changes
that are beneficial to all interests. The recommendations made by
indigenous health experts in 1999, reflect our firm belief and commitment
to the goals of the Decade.
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and
Malaria
1. The Global
Fund was set up in 2001 as a joint initiative involving governments, civil
society organizations and the private sector as equal partners to increase
funding for and fight the overwhelming AIDS, TB and Malaria crisis that we
face today across the globe. It is to be seen as an experiment in a novel
approach to governance and development decision-making in a “globalising”
world. The Global Fund is committed to a transparent and accountable
process so that health inequities in the available resources, services and
drugs to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria may be better addressed.
1. AIDS, TB and
Malaria have drastically affected indigenous peoples and their
communities. The devastation caused by these health problems alone has
resulted in dramatic and tragic changes in our social, cultural and
survival issues, already greatly compromised by many discriminatory
policies, programmes, legislation and acts.
1. The Committee
on Indigenous Health has made many attempts during the past months,
through both international NGOs directly cooperating closely with the
Global Fund as well as by directly approaching the Global Fund’s Interim
Executive Director, Anders Nordstrom, to cooperate actively with the
on-going process of administering the fund. (See Annex 4).
Non-governmental organizations are represented in the administration of
this Fund but, unfortunately, equitable participation by Indigenous People
is not taking place. Indigenous peoples legitimately demand a place too.
To date, we have not received any response from the Global Fund.
1. It is very
crucial that the Global Fund give indigenous peoples’ representative
organisations the opportunity of participation in presenting our critical
needs, in decision-making and in benefits from this global initiative.
1. As the
administrative aspects Global Fund are in the process of being stabilized
as a “quasi-governmental body”, i.e., a non-governmental entity with a
dominant inter-governmental character, the Permanent Forum and the United
Nations have a responsibility to ensure that indigenous peoples are fairly
represented in all aspects of this fund and its activities. It would be
unfortunate to witness another initiative with commendable goals that
fails to achieve the objectives.
1. Therefore, the
COIH request the Permanent Forum examine this initiative and define
effective recommendations to the appropriate authorities, institutions and
organs that exercise all the powers in this Fund.
Indigenous peoples’ health in other
international forums and agencies
1. Water is
Life. The provision of potable water as an important element for adequate
housing is clearly addressed and described by Special Rapporteur, Mr.
Miloon Kothari, in his first report mentioned earlier. In fact, the World
Bank along with other development banks is identified as a major offender
in supporting privatization of water in low-income communities for over
ten years. The Permanent Forum is encouraged to advance the topic of
right to drinking water supply as fundamental to the fulfillment of
economic, social and cultural rights as contained in the international
human rights instruments. Furthermore, it is heartening to know the
Commission on Human Rights in April 2001, decided, without a vote to
request the Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights
to review the terms of reference for the proposed study on the
relationship between the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights
and the promotion of the realization of the right to drinking water supply
and sanitation, and also to review the level of United Nations support
requested for such a study.
1. It is
noteworthy to bring to the attention of members of the Permanent Forum of
a particular resolution, which passed the 58th session of the Commission
on Human Rights. The Commission decided to appoint, for a period of three
years, a Special Rapporteur whose mandate will focus on the right of
everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical
and mental health, as reflected in article 25, paragraph 1, of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 12 of the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, article 24 of the
Convention on the Rights of the Child and article 12 of the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
1. Since 1995,
indigenous peoples and NGO's have been invited as observers to the UNESCO
discussions and debates before the International Bioethics Committee
(IBC). The final result of these debates culminated in the Universal
Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights adopted in 1997 by
UNESCO's General Conference, and endorsed by the UN General Assembly in
1998. In a measure (E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/L.23) on human rights and
bioethics, the Sub-Commission last year decided to entrust Ms.
Lulia-Antoanella Motoc with the preparation of a working paper on the
Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights as its
contribution to the reflections of the IBC on their follow-up to the
Universal Declaration. Possible extensions to the Declaration will be
considered during this evaluation period 2002-2003. Indigenous NGO's and
this Permanent Forum should be encouraged to submit perspectives, comments
and recommendations to Ms. Motoc especially about Indigenous Peoples right
to say no to “biopirates”, and to recognize the collective rights of
indigenous peoples. These are two major hurtles the IBC has been
unwilling to acknowledge hence there is no mention in the Universal
Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights.
1. The World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) General Assembly established the
Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic
Resources, Traditional knowledge and Folklore in October 2000. The
purpose of the Committee among others, deals with "intellectual property
issues that arise in the context of (I) access to genetic resources and
benefit sharing; (ii) protection of traditional knowledge, whether or not
associated with those resources; and (iii) the protection of expressions
of folklore". The first meeting of the Committee was in May 2001, and the
second in December 2001. The Committee will have three more sessions
within the next two years. It is encouraging that Indigenous NGO's are
being asked to participate and that WIPO announced that some indigenous
and local community representatives could be funded in order to ensure
their participation in the third session of the Committee scheduled to
take place from 17 to 21 June 2002. The fundamental concept is that
indigenous peoples’ knowledge is a collective heritage and should not be
traded. The Permanent Forum should examine the progress made in this
regard and advise on an alternative system that would serve to protect
indigenous knowledge from bio-pirates.
1. The Convention
on Biological Diversity (CBD), Conference of Parties VI adopted several
resolutions regarding indigenous peoples. The fundamental need for clear
and binding frameworks to support and strengthen the protection of
traditional knowledge is still elusive. The work of the CBD and of the
WIPO need to be mutually supportive.
1. The Food
Agricultural Organization (FAO) is central to the CBD, particularly
article 8(j). Indeed, traditional and local communities including farmers
were key stakeholders in all FAO policies and activities. In November
2001 the FAO Conference adopted the new International Treaty on Plant
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The Treaty provides for
Farmer's rights, equitable sharing of benefits arising from their sue, in
harmony with the CBD. The Treaty will succeed the International
Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources. The 19th session of the Working
Group on Indigenous Populations has "requested the High Commissioner on
Human Rights to encourage studies with respect to the rights to food and
adequate nutrition of Indigenous peoples and Indigenous peoples and
poverty, stressing the linkage between their present general situation and
their land rights, and to develop further cooperation with the Food and
Agriculture Organization and the World Food Program on Indigenous issues.
In support of these endeavors the FAO helped finance the Indigenous
Peoples International Consultations on the Right to Food. The report and
Declaration of Atitlan, Guatemala is now an official document where the
participants reached a consensus on the priority issues faced by
indigenous peoples with regard to food security; and Develop a document
with a plan of action addressing these priority issues, with positions and
demands from the perspectives of Indigenous Peoples, on their right to
development and their right to food.
1. In resolution
(E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/L.14) the Working Group on Indigenous Populations
recommended that the Commission on Human Rights invite the UNDP and the
World Bank to present their new policy guidelines on indigenous peoples at
its twentieth session. Many indigenous peoples did not respond to the
invitation by the World Bank to review and comment on changes to O.D. 4.20
(1991) to the new revised version O.D. 4.10 which is much weaker and a
disadvantage to Indigenous Peoples. It was felt that by participating in
the policy changes indigenous organizations would be in agreement to the
changes. Indigenous organizations are pleased that the World Bank
representative in Geneva has stated he will include indigenous
representatives in the GEF/NGO/UNEP and World Bank consultations as first
steps for more direct participation.
Recommendations
1. The Permanent
Forum is requested under its mandate to take the following recommendations
into consideration in its inaugural session.
1. Examine, with
utmost priority and greatest attention, all developments in various
international agencies and UN bodies and develop a protocol and permanent
mechanism under its authority whereby all economic, cultural and political
sectors of specialized agencies and bodies of the UN dealing with
health-related issues, or have relevance to health according to the
perspective of indigenous peoples, work in partnership with indigenous
peoples own experts and representatives and work towards coordinating
their policies and programmes of action to ensure that the health of
indigenous peoples is maintained as a cross-cutting priority.
1. Facilitate the
establishment of an Indigenous Peoples’ Health Advisory Group by WHO as a
matter of priority according to the Terms of Reference recommended by the
COIH, and request WHO to urgently implement the recommendations of the
International Consultation on the Health of Indigenous Peoples.
1. Establish the
means to examine the role and functions of the Global Fund for AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria and all other similar international initiatives
to ensure indigenous peoples’ representative organisations the opportunity
of meaningful participation in presenting their critical needs, in
decision-making and in benefits from GFATM.
1. Establish a
continuing and constructive relationship between the Permanent Forum and
the Committee on Indigenous Health, as an indigenous peoples’ independent
and representative focal point on indigenous health issues.
Annex 1
The Geneva Declaration On The Health And Survival
Of Indigenous Peoples
Annex 2
Summary Recommendations Of The International
Consultation On The Health Of Indigenous Peoples, Geneva, 23-26 November
1999 (WHO/HSD/00.1)
Annex 3 WHO
Advisory Group On Indigenous Peoples’ Health: Draft Terms Of Reference
Annex 4 COIH Letter to
the Global Fund to Fights AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
[1]
The present Members of the Committee on Indigenous Health are:
Charon Asetoyer - Chairperson, (Native
American Women’s Health Education Resource Center)
D. Roy Laifungbam - co-Chairperson, (Centre
for Organisation Research & Education Manipur)
Elisabeth Bell -
(Metis Nation)
Rhonda Griffiths
- (Norfolk Islander)
Jose Carlos Morales
- (Costa Rica)
Germaine Tremmel - (Native
American Women’s Health Education Resource Center)
Ellen Wright
- (Native American)
International Indian
Treaty Council - Member (Contact: Antonio
Gonzales)
Larissa Abroutina
- (RAIPON)
Abdoulahi Monsarrat
- (TINHINAN)
Emmanuel Lousot
- (Kenya)
Tarcila Rivera Zea
- (Chirapaq)
Naomi Mayers
- (Australia)
Apenisa Ratu
- (Fiji Island)
Silole Mpoki
(Contact Lucy Mulenki) -
(African Indigenous Women’s Organisation)
TEBTEBBA Foundation
Inc. -
Member (Contact: Victoria Tauli-Corpuz)
|